Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
en:possible_integration_options_3_in_biostar_2 [2020/04/14 15:09] yjjung [Possible Integration Option 3 : G-SDK] |
en:possible_integration_options_3_in_biostar_2 [2020/04/14 15:10] yjjung [What is different from BioStar 2 Device SDK?] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
| One of the biggest advantages of G-SDK compare to Device SDK is that it supports various languages. For the last years, Device SDK users have had difficulty using development language other than C++ or C# which is in the sample code. \\ | One of the biggest advantages of G-SDK compare to Device SDK is that it supports various languages. For the last years, Device SDK users have had difficulty using development language other than C++ or C# which is in the sample code. \\ | ||
| Since BioStar 2 Device SDK can communicate with C++ library, you have to use C++ language or need to marshall all the APIs and structures in the library into other languages. Currently BioStar 2 Device SDK provides only C# marshalling sample. \\ | Since BioStar 2 Device SDK can communicate with C++ library, you have to use C++ language or need to marshall all the APIs and structures in the library into other languages. Currently BioStar 2 Device SDK provides only C# marshalling sample. \\ | ||
| + | This is a limitation of BioStar 2 Device SDK due to the structure. \\ | ||
| {{:en:gsdk_devicesdkstructure.png?900|}} \\ | {{:en:gsdk_devicesdkstructure.png?900|}} \\ | ||
| ** [Figure 3. BioStar 2 Device SDK structure] ** \\ | ** [Figure 3. BioStar 2 Device SDK structure] ** \\ | ||
| - | This is a limitation of BioStar 2 Device SDK due to the structure. \\ | ||
| \\ | \\ | ||