Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- en:possible_integration_options_3_in_biostar_2 [2020/04/14 13:41]
yjjung created
+++ en:possible_integration_options_3_in_biostar_2 [2020/04/14 14:50]
yjjung
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-==== What is G-SDK? ====
+==== G-SDK download link & Manual ====
-G-SDK is a new way of communicating with BioStar devices. It is a lightweight, scalable, and cross-platform solution which will expedite your development. Based on gRPC, it supports many programming languages such as Java, C#, Python, Node.js, Go, etc.
+Download : https://github.com/biostar-dev/g-sdk/ \\
+Manual : https://biostar-dev.github.io/g-sdk/
-==== What is different from BioStar 2 Device SDK? ====
+\\
-Existing BioStar 2 Device SDK provides C++ library with C#. G-SDK is released to provide flexible development for those who would like to meet the requirements below.
+\\
+==== G-SDK Overview ====
+G-SDK is one of integration options for communicating with BioStar 2 devices. It is a lightweight, scalable, and cross-platform solution which will expedite your development. \\
+Based on gRPC, it supports many programming languages such as Java, C#, Python, Node.js, Go, etc. \\
+\\
 ** Multi-language support **
   * Language-neutral IDL
   * Native client libraries
-** Mobile/cloud ready **
+\\
-  * Easily deployable on Cloud
+\\
-  * Accessible from mobile devices directly
+{{:en:gsdk_structure.png?400|}} \\
+** [Figure 1. Device Gateway Structure] ** \\
+\\
+** Device Gateway ** that communicates with BioStar 2 device can be run on a server or cloud. ** Core modules ** use BioStar 2 protocols and written by GO language.\\
+==== What is different from BioStar 2 Device SDK? ====
+Existing BioStar 2 Device SDK provides C++ library with C#. G-SDK is released to provide flexible development for those who would like to meet the requirements below.
 Let's take a look for an easy comparison between BioStar 2 Device SDK and G-SDK. \\
 {{:en:gsdk_comparison.png?600|}} \\
-** [Figure 1. BioStar 2 Device SDK vs G-SDK] ** \\
+** [Figure 2. BioStar 2 Device SDK vs G-SDK] ** \\
+\\
 \\
 One of the biggest advantages of G-SDK compare to Device SDK is that it supports various languages. For the last years, Device SDK users have had difficulty using development language other than C++ or C# which is in the sample code. \\
+Since BioStar 2 Device SDK can communicate with C++ library, you have to use C++ language or need to marshall all the APIs and structures in the library into other languages. Currently BioStar 2 Device SDK provides only C# marshalling sample. \\
+{{:en:gsdk_devicesdkstructure.png?600|}} \\
+** [Figure 3. BioStar 2 Device SDK structure] ** \\
+This is a limitation of BioStar 2 Device SDK due to the structure. \\
 \\
+\\
-How G-SDK can support so many languages? \\
+''How G-SDK can support so many languages?''  \\
 It is because G-SDK is based on gRPC. gRPC is an open RPC framework that supports many languages developed by Google. \\
-Basically, the device gateway is the one that communicates with Suprema device. Your client applications can connect to it using gRPC client libraries.\\
+Basically, the device gateway is the one that communicates with BioStar 2 device. Your client applications can connect to it using gRPC client libraries.\\
 \\
+{{:en:gsdk_gsdkstructure.png?600|}} \\
+** [Figure 4. G-SDK structure] ** \\
+\\
+==== What are the next features ====
+** 1. Master Gateway ** \\
+G-SDK can support up to 1000 device connections with a Device gateway. \\
+Currently the Master gateway that will support up to 100,000 device connections is under development. \\
+Master Gateway helps you handle multiple Device gateways and it can be deployed on a cloud server or provide mobile direct accessibility too. \\
+** 2. More language sample support ** \\
+G-SDK provides C#, Java,