Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- en:possible_integration_options_3_in_biostar_2 [2020/04/14 13:49]
yjjung [What is different from BioStar 2 Device SDK?]
+++ en:possible_integration_options_3_in_biostar_2 [2020/04/14 14:12]
yjjung
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-==== What is G-SDK? ====
-G-SDK is a new way of communicating with BioStar devices. It is a lightweight, scalable, and cross-platform solution which will expedite your development. Based on gRPC, it supports many programming languages such as Java, C#, Python, Node.js, Go, etc.
 ==== G-SDK download link & Manual ====
 Download : https://github.com/biostar-dev/g-sdk/ \\
 Manual : https://biostar-dev.github.io/g-sdk/
+\\
+\\
 ==== G-SDK Overview ====
 G-SDK is one of integration options for communicating with BioStar 2 devices. It is a lightweight, scalable, and cross-platform solution which will expedite your development. \\
@@ Line 26: / Line 23: @@
 \\
 \\
+{{:en:gsdk_structure.png|}} \\
+** [Figure 1. G-SDK Structure] ** \\
+\\
+The device Gateway that communicates with BioStar 2 device can be run on a server or cloud. The core modules use BioStar 2 protocols and written by GO language.\\
@@ Line 34: / Line 37: @@
 Let's take a look for an easy comparison between BioStar 2 Device SDK and G-SDK. \\
 {{:en:gsdk_comparison.png?600|}} \\
-** [Figure 1. BioStar 2 Device SDK vs G-SDK] ** \\
+** [Figure 2. BioStar 2 Device SDK vs G-SDK] ** \\
+\\
 \\
 One of the biggest advantages of G-SDK compare to Device SDK is that it supports various languages. For the last years, Device SDK users have had difficulty using development language other than C++ or C# which is in the sample code. \\
 \\