Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
en:possible_integration_options_3_in_biostar_2 [2020/04/14 14:58]
yjjung [What are the next features]
en:possible_integration_options_3_in_biostar_2 [2020/04/14 14:58]
yjjung [What is different from BioStar 2 Device SDK?]
Line 24: Line 24:
  
 Let's take a look for an easy comparison between BioStar 2 Device SDK and G-SDK. \\ Let's take a look for an easy comparison between BioStar 2 Device SDK and G-SDK. \\
-{{:​en:​gsdk_comparison.png?​600|}} \\+{{:​en:​gsdk_comparison.png?​900|}} \\
 ** [Figure 2. BioStar 2 Device SDK vs G-SDK] ** \\  ** [Figure 2. BioStar 2 Device SDK vs G-SDK] ** \\ 
 \\ \\
Line 30: Line 30:
 One of the biggest advantages of G-SDK compare to Device SDK is that it supports various languages. For the last years, Device SDK users have had difficulty using development language other than C++ or C# which is in the sample code. \\ One of the biggest advantages of G-SDK compare to Device SDK is that it supports various languages. For the last years, Device SDK users have had difficulty using development language other than C++ or C# which is in the sample code. \\
 Since BioStar 2 Device SDK can communicate with C++ library, you have to use C++ language or need to marshall all the APIs and structures in the library into other languages. Currently BioStar 2 Device SDK provides only C# marshalling sample. \\ Since BioStar 2 Device SDK can communicate with C++ library, you have to use C++ language or need to marshall all the APIs and structures in the library into other languages. Currently BioStar 2 Device SDK provides only C# marshalling sample. \\
-{{:​en:​gsdk_devicesdkstructure.png?​600|}} \\+{{:​en:​gsdk_devicesdkstructure.png?​900|}} \\
 ** [Figure 3. BioStar 2 Device SDK structure] ** \\  ** [Figure 3. BioStar 2 Device SDK structure] ** \\